[80091] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Apr 24 05:07:39 2005
To: Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2005 01:35:11 PDT."
<18a5e7cb0504240135cb028fa@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 05:07:03 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1114333623_5912P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 01:35:11 PDT, Bill Stewart said:
> There are a variety of things that don't like PPLB, notably IPSEC.
The fact that a variety of things (like PMTU Discovery) don't like it when
people block all ICMP doesn't stop it from happening. Similarly for a number
of other less-than-perfect-ideas-deployed-anyhow in the past. Why should we
expect PPLB to be any different?
--==_Exmh_1114333623_5912P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFCa2G3cC3lWbTT17ARAlLYAJ4tiO7k2G+buK8NEQlSzP1LmDv4XwCeJphd
HYOrfLCYcn9itt9fJxfp6+k=
=FHEb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1114333623_5912P--
