[8009] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: 03/05/97 Internet Routing Problems

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pierre Thibaudeau)
Thu Mar 6 11:00:26 1997

Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 10:52:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Thibaudeau <prt@Teleglobe.CA>
To: "Alex.Bligh" <amb@xara.net>
Cc: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>, routing-problems@merit.edu,
        nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199703061539.PAA19745@diamond.xara.net>

On Thu, 6 Mar 1997, Alex.Bligh wrote:

>    > This is a prinicpal example of why people should be filtering on
>    > both inbound & outbound announcements of default & RFC1918 address
>    > space.
>    
>    Well we do this (we also filter out some other things we
>    don't want to hear from other people), but this set me
>    thinking. Is there anyone who actually has a good reason
>    to propogate default and reserved addresses through the RA?
>    Wouldn't it be a good move for the RA itself to filter
>    these announcements (in addition to what's in the policy)?

Alex,

At least in theory, it is. Read paragraph titled "The Routing Arbiter's
Responsibility" in <http://www.ra.net/RADB.tools.docs/radbserv.html>.


>    
>    Alex Bligh
>    Xara Networks
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    

__

Pierre Thibaudeau                     |   e-mail: <prt@Teleglobe.CA>
TELEGLOBE CANADA                      |
1000, rue de La Gauchetiere ouest     |      Tel: +1-514-868-7257
Montreal, QC   H3B 4X5                |
Canada                                |      fax: +1-514-868-8446


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post