[79969] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Popovitch)
Tue Apr 19 12:12:52 2005
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop@yahoo.com>
To: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20050419.084745.5555.402725@webmail25.lax.untd.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:11:55 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--=-AfNYxqH+A7rsd7W2aq30
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 15:47 +0000, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>=20
> Interesting thread on /. --
>=20
> http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D05/04/18/198259&tid=3D95&tid=3D1=
28&tid=3D4
The original poster doesn't identify what his starting TTL was before he
made his change. I didn't read all the responses, but I can see how an
original 14 day TTL could take 4 weeks to propagate from master to end-
user, given the amount of testing he/she was doing *prior* to making the
change.
-Jim P.
--=-AfNYxqH+A7rsd7W2aq30
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCZS3Luhh7yV/E9I4RAnY8AJwK88SLyMHGMLhcgsG/298dSfBbXQCdHZtP
vfYMPLTetSuuKFhp0Pxia6w=
=aI34
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-AfNYxqH+A7rsd7W2aq30--
