[79714] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AUP for NANOG?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Romain Komorn)
Thu Apr 14 12:14:18 2005
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:14:30 -0700
From: Romain Komorn <rkomorn@globat.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <16990.36882.559473.632474@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I'm at a bit of a loss trying to understand how bashing other lists
constitutes an improvement on bashing other members of the NANOG list.
I think the point of Matthew's email was that no one really cares for
the bash fests, regardless of who it targets, be it on list, or off list.
Personally, having joined NANOG a couple of months ago, I've been much
more taken aback by the amount of off topic griping about each other or
about whoever decides whatever somewhere, than I have been impressed by
the amount of useful information to be gleaned from people's posts.
I hadn't ever really planned on joining the post list to be able to send
something to the list. I'm a little disappointed that my first urge to
post has come from being tired of off-topic rants more than wanting to
contribute something useful to the list.
Romain Komorn
Web Hosting Made Easy
http://www.Globat.com/
Randy Bush wrote:
>>>This reminds me of the way others behaved when I entered the field
>>>some 25 years ago. Some people were very helpful and friendly.
>>>Others responded very arrogantly with the tone of "how stupid you
>>>are for asking that question."
>>
>>I didn't know you read misc@openbsd.org or questions@freebsd.org
>>... :)
>
>
> you wanna see bad second grade playground behavior, try the
> asterisk mailing list.
>
> randy
>
