[79674] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Wed Apr 13 17:51:48 2005
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>
To: "'Dean Anderson'" <dean@av8.com>, <froomkin@law.tm>
Cc: "'Jay R. Ashworth'" <jra@baylink.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:51:14 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504131734530.18566-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I'd prefer it if you gave an opinion on how this was
operationally relevant?
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I agree, it is very unusual to
> transfer a trademark without transferring the product it
> identifies. I didn't know it was impossible.
>
> Since you are an expert on the subject, I would like to have
> your opinion regarding how ISC can claim a trademark on BIND,
> assuming no transfer ever took place. Or if you think it
> cannot reasonably make such a claim.
>
