[79660] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Crocker)
Wed Apr 13 12:24:39 2005
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Reply-To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:24:13 -0700
In-Reply-To: <OF411981BD.2BCF4E0E-ON80256FE2.0038261F-80256FE2.0038CCF9@radianz.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> This is all a tempest in a teapot and it is all caused by a poor choice=
of
> headings and seems to be a knee jerk reaction to several possible ways=
in
> which the heading can be misunderstood.
Auerbach complains about ICANN.
He challenges process rather than outcomes.
He even cites the absence of protracted, public dialogue as 'proof' that=
input
is being ignored.
The input turns out to be markedly minimal, where he comprises 25% of it.
An anti-ICANN website publishes it.
Why is it anyone thinks this sort of icann-bashing-as-usual, is somehow
significant and worthy of burdening nanog?
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
