[79612] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Tue Apr 12 07:38:32 2005
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:38:05 +0200
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <OF18A7E545.A5C74316-ON80256FE1.003DD580-80256FE1.003E9585@radianz.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
* Michael.Dillon@radianz.com [Tue 12 Apr 2005, 13:21 CEST]:
> As for gigE, if you open up the WRT54G you will see
> that it has a mini-PCI wireless card. Some people
Only the original (v1.0) hardware had that, so don't all rush to the
stores to see how well a 133MHz processor would cope with GigE, people...
>> In this case, I do. It's a consumer product.
>
> One way to solve this problem, and recognize that many
> IP network operators sell service to consumers as well
> as peering, would be to offer the inet-access mailing
> list to come under the NANOG umbrella, and then encourage
> discussions to move to the appropriate list. There is no
> reason why the NANOG community needs to limit itself to
> a single-focus mailing list and a single-track conference.
We can already ask people to take their discussions to the appropriate
place. No need for that other place to fall under the same umbrella.
NANOG has a charter, and this whole thread falls squarely outside it.
-- Niels.
--
The idle mind is the devil's playground
