|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:03:21 +0200 (MET DST) From: Paul Wouters <paul@xtdnet.nl> To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <20050409074151.GA30947@nic.fr> X-MailScanner-From: paul@xtdnet.nl Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind > > If transitioning from BIND, why go to the non-free and non-compliant > djbdns instead of nsd (http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/)? I couldn't agree more. At least BIND9 and NSD both support RFC 4035, and I am getting tired of hearing about these cache poisoning hypes lately. Last one to secure his zone is a luser :) Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |