[79513] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The power of default configurations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric A. Hall)
Fri Apr 8 23:53:17 2005
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:52:54 -0400
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
To: just me <matt@snark.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0504081516480.10312@pants.snark.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 4/8/2005 6:19 PM, just me wrote:
> I don't really want to speak for anyone else here, but it always
> appeared to me that the problem Vix keeps mentioning is queries
> with 1918 SOURCE ADDRESSES, not 1918-space queries.
>
> This thread, like every nanog thread, has completely lost focus of
> the original issue, and devolved into some brain-damaged solution to
> an imagined problem.
I don't think it's a bad question. We just went through a similar talk in
the zetroconf wg about local addresses. Besides, the question wasn't
Paul's in the first place.
| From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
| To: nanog@merit.edu
| Subject: The power of default configurations
| Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504061756550.5174@clifden.donelan.com>
|
| On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Paul Vixie wrote:
| > adding more. oh and as long as you're considering whether to
| > restrict things to your LAN/campus/ISP, i'm ready to see rfc1918
| > filters deployed...
|
| Why does BIND forward lookups for RFC1918 addresses by default?
Sorry we are bothering you are mail spool.
--
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
