|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:19:31 -0600 From: Chris Kuethe <chris.kuethe@gmail.com> Reply-To: Chris Kuethe <chris.kuethe@gmail.com> To: vickyr@socal.rr.com Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <42570BD3.9040401@socal.rr.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Apr 8, 2005 4:55 PM, Vicky Rode <vickyr@socal.rr.com> wrote: > > http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/04/06/197203&from=rss > > Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind and if so > any feedback. > > regards, > /vicky I used to use djbdns on my laptop for testing things, and then I took an afternoon, learned to write BIND zone files, and decided I should just use the BIND that comes with so many modern unixen and that powers so much of the internet anyway... Since then, I've always preferred deploying bind over djbdns. Even if it was easier to configure, the installation process for DJBDNS always really annoyed me. So that's a djbdns *to* bind transition story. CK -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |