[7949] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Big Squeeze
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Sun Mar 2 23:32:02 1997
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 22:23:33 -0600 (CST)
From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
To: nanog@merit.edu
>> I would suggest that the largest percentage of flapping prefixes in the
>> global routing system belong to prefixes longer than /19.
>
>Hence the convention to damp differently for different lengths. See one of
>the foils in http://www.psg.com/~randy/970210.nanog/, which suggests that we
>over here start following the European lead on this.
Is the route computation of a /8 prefix flapping once a second any
different than a /24 flapping once a second? If /8's are "naturally"
more stable, then why allow them to flap more before dampening them?
When dampening was first being rolled out I remember one of the early
networks that got hit was PSI's net 38/8. Treating flapping prefixes
differently based on length has more to do with how many people scream
when prefixes covering a large amount of address space get dampened
than the impact of the route flap of an individual prefix on the router.
Although most folks have permanently filtered it, isn't 1/8 still the
flappiest prefix of all.
--
Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
Affiliation given for identification not representation
