[79442] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The power of default configurations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Thu Apr 7 13:58:54 2005
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Message from Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
of "Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:56:01 +0300."
<42557431.5@he.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:58:28 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> IMO, RFC1918 went off the track when both ISP's and registries started
> asking their customers if they have "seriously considered using 1918 space
> instead of applying for addresses". This caused many kinds of renumbering
> nightmares, overlapping addresses, near death of ipv6, etc.
just checking... does that mean you favour the one-prefix-per-asn implicit
allocation model, or the ipv6 version of 1918 which intentionally doesn't
overlap in order to serve inter-enterprise links, or what exactly?
