[79310] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elmar K. Bins)
Sat Apr 2 06:49:28 2005
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:48:51 +0200
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi@4ever.de>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <16973.37738.75822.791211@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
randy@psg.com (Randy Bush) wrote:
> > a.nic.de, 100 packets, 7% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 163.454/199.368/494.708 ms
> >
> > c.de.net, 100 packets, 2% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 15.071/46.131/724.957 ms
> >
> > z.nic.de, 100 packets, 3% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 180.9/222.723/578.468 ms
> >
> > s.de.net, 100 packets, 0% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 184.26/219.786/501.547 ms
> >
> > l.de.net, 100 packets, 1% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 170.435/211.573/568.7 ms
> >
> > f.nic.de, 100 packets, 5% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 171.717/206.826/489.947 ms
> >
> > Overall for DENIC: 3% loss and 15ms / 166ms / 725ms min/avg/max latency.
> > c.de.net is the one I'd be using, and it gives 2% loss and 46ms latency.
>
> c.de.net is the one you WISH your resolver would use. sometimes
> it might, others it might not.
Maybe Bill tunes his resolver.
Nonetheless, two things come to mind: why the heck have you gotten
such huge RTTs to z? I'd pretty much like to see your traceroute...
The other: ICMP has been rate-limited. It might not be the way to
test those locations. An mtr output would be more interesting :)
Elmar.
