[79192] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Florian Weimer)
Thu Mar 31 16:09:53 2005
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>
Cc: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:08:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <424C63D3.40805@nipper.de> (Arnold Nipper's message of "Thu, 31
Mar 2005 22:55:47 +0200")
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
* Arnold Nipper:
> On 31.03.2005 22:36 Florian Weimer wrote
>
>> Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan or Verisign in many
>> aspects, so it's a non-issue in the end.
>
> But only if you judge according to Telcordia's metric.
Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared
apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's
200=A0ms (or what the actual numbers where).
> As always: Never trust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...
I doubt that DENIC will ever publish the technical part of its bid, so
this isn't convincing.
