[79149] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Adams)
Thu Mar 31 10:58:03 2005
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:52:46 -0600
From: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <a2937c3305033020065e56e3a3@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Once upon a time, Jamie Norwood <jamie.norwood@gmail.com> said:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:36:19 -0600, Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Eric A. Hall <ehall@ehsco.com> said:
> > > Do you also block NNTP so that customers have to use your servers?
> >
> > Change that to SMTP and you'll get a bunch of "yes" answers. Why is one
> > right and the other wrong?
>
> Heard of a little thing called 'spam'?
Heard of a little thing called a 'rhetorical question'?
Who decides that it is okay for ISPs to block SMTP and not okay for them
to block VoIP? If it is okay to block SMTP because "people do bad
things" (i.e. spam), how long will it be before RIAA/MPAA/etc. demand
ISPs block P2P programs for the same reason? If the a government gets
involved and says it is illegal for ISPs to block VoIP, how long before
a spammer tries to use the same ruling to say it is illegal to block
SMTP?
--
Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
