[79142] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Boehnlein)
Thu Mar 31 10:28:19 2005

Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:25:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Greg Boehnlein <damin@nacs.net>
To: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
Cc: Bill Nash <billn@billn.net>, "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>,
	"Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <p06200722be71a8185ee2@[10.0.1.3]>
X-N2Net-MailShield-From: damin@nacs.net
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Brad Knowles wrote:

[Deleted]

> 	What I really think we need here are some "truth-in-advertising" 
> laws which are applied to oversubscription rates.  That'd solve the 
> problem really quick.

How about we regulat the Internet like the Electric Utility and charge per 
byte transferred? :)

That would shut down Peer To Peer traffic rather quickly, and it would 
ensure that everyone pays a fair amount for what they use.

I'm only half serious here.. However, I do agree that truth in advertising 
is a good thing.

On a different tact, where I -THINK- the market will eventually end up is 
w/ different classes of BroadBand service, whereby QOS and priority will 
be given to those that wish to pay for it. The $14.95 services will be a 
best-effort, and the $59.95 services will have priority.

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post