[79116] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Osmon)
Wed Mar 30 22:14:22 2005
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:19:40 -0700
From: John Osmon <josmon@rigozsaurus.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: John Osmon <josmon@rufus.rigozsaurus.com>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20050331000543.GC53507@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:05:44PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
[...]
> I think one of the major problems is that very few people know
> how to, or are capable of sending larger g711 frames (at increased
> delay, but more data per packet) because they can't set these more granular
> settings on their systems.. this means you have a lot higher pps
> rates which I think is the problem with the radio gear, it's just not
> designed for high pps rates..
So, how are the WISP folk dealing with VOIP traffic as it becomes a
larger piece of their customer's traffic? Does anyone have a way
to force a given VOIP endpoint to use larger data frames? Or are
the WISPs forced to deal with with a shredded business plan because
their gear is optimized for large packets? (Or am I simply
missing something?)
Or do you write a TOS that says: "Customer is not allowed to send and
receive lots of small packets quickly?" :-)
