[79074] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Tue Mar 29 22:18:58 2005
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:48:30 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200503291424.j2TEOqWj055660@nic-naa.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:24:52 -0500, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland
Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> wrote:
>
> A summary of the report and a link to the full report can be found at:
>
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-28mar05.htm
>
> So now you know. VGRS, NS+, AF, ranked 1, 2, 3; DE and CORE ranked 4 & 5.
>
I do believe that study is open to peer review?
Telcordia ranking VRSN way ahead does seem to be raising some hackles here
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
