[79013] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter John Hill)
Mon Mar 28 12:43:31 2005
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503280840060.15811@paixhost.pch.net>
From: Peter John Hill <peterjhill@cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:42:57 -0800
To: NANGO <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mar 28, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>> I like BGP more as I could transport that /32 with no-export
>> right away.
>
> Yes, in a simple hub-and-spoke anycast topology, iBGP is simplest. In
> a
> wagon-wheel or mesh topology, having an IGP makes some things simplest,
> though you can still use iBGP in that role.
Yep, use the best routing protocol that you already have running on the
connecting routers might be a decent rule of thumb... Therefore
enterprises (where I have worked) tend to use ospf.... I can understand
service providers using iBGP...
Peter
