[78973] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Sun Mar 27 15:33:28 2005
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:32:36 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
To: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200503262307.SAA02418@sigma.nrk.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, David Lesher wrote:
> > > ICANN Blames Melbourne IT for Panix Domain Hijacking
>
> I also don't see any discussion on what ICANN was during during the
> hijack situation; maybe I missed that part.
i dont believe this is icanns responsibility.. it is however their
responsibility to ensure proper registry procedures are put in place to prevent
this kind of occurance and provide emergency procedures for reversals when
problems such as suspected hijacks are encountered.
Steve
