[78755] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Florian Weimer)
Tue Mar 22 13:10:46 2005
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:10:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20050322174638.3E8AD3C03B4@berkshire.machshav.com> (Steven
M. Bellovin's message of "Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:46:38 -0500")
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
* Steven M. Bellovin:
> The news.com article links to the bill:
> http://www.le.state.ut.us/~2005/htmdoc/hbillhtm/hb0260s03.htm
Given that the bill tries to outlaw the distribution of pornography
(which means that it won't withstand judicial review), I think it's
astonishingly ISP-friendly. For example, it doesn't seem to make you
responsible for transit traffic in general, like many ISP contracts
do. 8-)
