[78749] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rachael Treu)
Tue Mar 22 12:48:46 2005
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:35:24 -0600
From: Rachael Treu <rara@navigo.com>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: Richard Irving <rirving@antient.org>, Roy <garlic@garlic.com>,
"Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503220932360.7546@paixhost.pch.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:33:44AM -0800, Bill Woodcock said something to the effect of:
>
> > > It's also voluntary on the part of the service provider.
> > What !?! Surely you Jest!
>
> Uh, yes, I was joking. Unfortunately, I do believe, on credible evidence,
> that there are people stupid enough to be trying to legislate the
> operation of the Internet without having first understood how it's done
> right now. Case in point.
>
> -Bill
What do you mean?! I'm writing an email right now to my
service provider, demanding that I get *only* porn. I
want all pr0n, all the time. No need to wast bandwidth
on this smtp garbage, or any other http-type hooey, for
that matter.
I want my OPoIP (only porn over IP)! I want it secured,
even! Encrypted porn with an SLA I can wave SLA about if
anything else slips through like pesky news or children's
pages or something icky.
Are you telling me my provider reserves the right to
refuse me this service? <sniff>
--ra ;)
--
k. rachael treu, CISSP rara@navigo.com
..quis custodiet ipsos custodes?..
(this email has been brought to you by the letters 'v' and 'i'.)
