[78504] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: public accessible snmp devices?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Popovitch)
Sun Mar 6 12:56:29 2005
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop@yahoo.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <422B3A01.3090008@equinephotoart.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:55:11 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 09:12 -0800, JC Dill wrote:
> The important thing is to determine which RFCs are being implemented,
> and why.
>
> <http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=2756>
:-)
Not that I am defending Juniper, but it seems to me that their response
"that the RFC wasnąt serious" is an indicator that they did in fact get
the "joke", however they didn't want to reply in a jovial fashion.
-Jim P.
