[78349] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: AOL scomp

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Maimon)
Tue Mar 1 22:36:55 2005

Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:36:26 -0500
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Cc: jes@nl.demon.net, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	Matt Taber <tabes@wmis.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <16933.11904.598342.979713@world.std.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu




Barry Shein wrote:
> 
> On March 1, 2005 at 14:17 jes@nl.demon.net (Jim Segrave) wrote:
>  > I don't understand this complaint - we process AOL TOS Notifications
>  > daily and I find perhaps 1 in a hundred or so are not valid complaints.
> 
> Here about 99% are not valid or interesting.
> 
> Which is to say, I had one small burst once caused by an infected
> customer machine which we got shut off fast and fixed.
> 
> The rest are virtually all just people on mailing lists hosted here
> sending each and every completely on-topic posting to TOS.
> 
> I suppose I should figure out some way to track them so I can boot
> them off those lists since AOL removes all identifying information.
> 

Apparently the ratio of valid/invalid AOL notifications is a usefull 
indicator on the cleanliness of the relevant network.

Some might suggest that large amounts of untrackable inaccurate 
complaints are themselves abuse.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post