[78309] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Mar 1 05:44:56 2005
To: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:30:21 GMT."
<OF7232ED36.28CFD033-ON80256FB7.00384997-80256FB7.0039B4E4@radianz.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 05:44:26 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1109673864_4087P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> No, I am not suggesting a return to the UUCP model. If I
> was then I would have said that. I am suggesting that
> we apply the lessons learned from the BGP peering model.
I'm skeptical that a model that only sort of works for under 30K ASNs
and maybe 1K bilateral peering agreements for the *really* big Tier-1s
won't scale to a world that has 40M+ .com domains and probably a million
SMTP servers.
--==_Exmh_1109673864_4087P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFCJEeIcC3lWbTT17ARArtEAKDHyciyaerRHFWo9doAPIdjKEIW5gCg64Id
co9whDnoxqbMVTndHO4ko2k=
=ktuc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1109673864_4087P--
