[78134] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UN Panel Aims to End Internet Tug of War by July
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Feb 22 13:54:23 2005
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:53:47 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: rosshosman@spamarrest.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <26515889.1109080402985.JavaMail.root@m15>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========3D29CE94CFC38715ABEF==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
What if the UN says ITU should run the TLDs, ICANN says yes, and, a
significant portion of the operational internet says no?
Owen
--On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:53 AM -0800 Ross=20
<rosshosman@spamarrest.com> wrote:
>
>
> No government will ever have the internet's best interest in mind when
> they talk about controlling it. Luckily government control has been kept
> some what to a minimum so far but it's growing rapidly and this is
> another attempt for a government body to "control" the internet.
>
> I wonder what new rules will be put in place if the ITU gets control?
>
> I also wonder if the ITU can really take control. What if the U.N. says
> the ITU should run the TLD's and ICANN says no?
>
>
>
> On Mon Feb 21 18:15:00 PST 2005, Joel Jaeggli <joelja
> @darkwing.uoregon.edu=3D""> wrote:</joelja>
>
> > When I hear Robert Mugabe talk about internet governance I don't
> really
> > get the impression that he has the interests of the people of
> Zimbabwe at
> > heart.
> >
> > joelja
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Dave Crocker wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:45:12 -0500, Scott W Brim wrote:
> >>> > I'm intrigued at the failure to distinguish between
> the web and
> >>> >
> >>> > email, given that spam is a messaging phenomenon, not
> a publishing
> >>> > phenomenon.
> >>> >
> >>> It's actually a failure to distinguish the web from the
> Internet
> >>
> >> i was probably too cryptic. yes, they are using the term 'web'
> to mean 'the internet'.
> >>
> >> the problem is that professional writing needs to be careful,
> and a failure at such a basic level as using web to apply to email does
> not bode well for the utility of the article...
> >>
> >>
> >> d/
> >> --
> >> Dave Crocker
> >> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> >> +1.408.246.8253
> >> dcrocker a t ...
> >> WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting
> joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu
> > GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB
> B67F 56B2
> >
>
--=20
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
--==========3D29CE94CFC38715ABEF==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCG3+7n5zKWQ/iqj0RAuzeAKCHCewXBOXt2hITUS5s1N58MySzngCff+EJ
qDO5AAQh/D58iN2PnW5WAi8=
=PCtX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========3D29CE94CFC38715ABEF==========--
