[78120] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NANOG Changes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hannigan, Martin)
Mon Feb 21 14:00:27 2005
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:56:50 -0500
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
To: "Bill Nash" <billn@billn.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Nash [mailto:billn@billn.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 9:53 PM
> To: Hannigan, Martin
> Cc: William Allen Simpson; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: NANOG Changes
>=20
>=20
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>=20
> > [ snip ]
> >
> >> As I was browsing the archive, I
> >> noticed my post and his and another one from William Leizon
> >> that quoted
> >> mine have been removed from it.
> >
> >> From what I understand, the archive feature wasn't turned on until
> > just before the first post that was actually archived appeared.
> >
>=20
> So, now that archiving is on (for those of us reading the=20
> archive instead=20
> of subbing to the traffic), can those posts be resubmitted=20
> for the sake of=20
> posterity?
Bill;
Let me correct a mischaracterization. I have nothing to do
with any technical or administrative issue on nanog-futures.
I'm just a poster like anyone else.
As far as the nanog-futures archive goes? You'd think it
would be a relatively simple operation to add something that's
missing. How about just resending it as a "historical
note" and if some person feels really strongly that it
must be authenticated, by all means, PGP sign it.
-M<
=20
