[77518] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Jan 23 00:55:57 2005
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Cc: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:00:29 EST."
<p06020407be18d72a5038@[192.168.1.103]>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:55:09 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1106459708_3985P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:00:29 EST, John Curran said:
> If you believe that REGISTRAR LOCK meets the need, then I've failed
> to adequately communicate my requirements. The requirement is my
> domain remains unchanged despite complete failure or fraud of any
> number of registrars.
Do you have a requirement that the domain remain unchanged even in the
face of fraud on the part of the registry itself? And what level of
"Yes I really mean it" documentation do you consider sufficient to
turn this *off* in case you *do* need to change something? Does it
have to resist a forged e-mail? Forged fax and hacking your phone system
so they can answer the confirmation callback? Forged notarized forms
mailed to the registry rescinding the lock? A determined "black helicopter"
attack on the part of a competitor?
--==_Exmh_1106459708_3985P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFB8zw8cC3lWbTT17ARArtvAJoCs8r4UAhtkHW2lkthIu/Cv6hu0ACfUUtn
JhBXJs/fPrdkRNvjq/6NbNg=
=YqAO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1106459708_3985P--
