[77460] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: improving the registrar transfer process
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thornton)
Thu Jan 20 18:55:57 2005
From: Thornton <thornton-nanog@cierragroup.com>
To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB54BB80E0@balius.mit>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:55:29 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:28 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does
> pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court
> on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if
> they continued not to allow transfers for .com.
>
> See:
>
> http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html
>
> The original judgment is at:
>
> http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html
>
>
yes they did. now pacnames in another country supposedly bought
capital... at least they are allowing you to transfer away this time
though
auDA being proactive is good...now its time icann is...
