[77328] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: netblazer Was: baiting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland )
Tue Jan 18 11:34:11 2005
To: "Robert E.Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>
Cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>,
"Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>,
"'wsimpson@greendragon.com'" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>, brunner@nic-naa.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:10:37 EST."
<87fz0ywwea.fsf@valhalla.seastrom.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:29:10 +0000
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> My recollection of that show was "T-1 to BARRnet", not
> bonded-Netblazer-dialout, but I didn't "work the show" until the
> following spring, so my recollection could be at fault.
Hey Robert,
Correct, but we stuck in the NB because the funtional principle (demand
dial and route) was distinct. The T-1 to BARNet was the fastpath (but
providing it didn't entitle the provider to one of my tee shirts).
Fun. Before the greedbots went non-linear on the rising edge of the bubble.
Eric
