[77131] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Jan 14 01:32:05 2005
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:30:22 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200501132305.j0DN55AD078291@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========3B84473B3CCB4240F99C==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.
Owen
--On Friday, January 14, 2005 10:05 +1100 Mark Andrews=20
<Mark_Andrews@isc.org> wrote:
>
>> What is wrong with MTAMARK?
>
> As currently described it doesn't fit well with RFC 2317
> style delegations. They would need to be converted to use
> DNAME instead of CNAME which requires all the delegating
> servers to be upgraded to support DNAME.
>
> There are other issues but hear is not the correct place
> to debate them.
--=20
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
--==========3B84473B3CCB4240F99C==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFB52b+n5zKWQ/iqj0RAua7AJwN/DaSBWaipDruyYE8Wqn5nG25/ACfaKOE
0zcf1TKFvVx844ziwxdEhhc=
=I98M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========3B84473B3CCB4240F99C==========--
