[77087] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Jan 12 17:42:46 2005
To: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:23:42 GMT."
<OF724F416D.4A48D534-ON80256F87.003DEC6C-80256F87.003E9815@radianz.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:41:33 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1105569693_29183P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:23:42 GMT, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com said:
> I happen to believe that a web of email peering
> agreements is the best way to get us to the point
> where it is difficult for anyone to anonymously
> send email because they *MUST* relay it through
> an ISP who will not accept the email for relay
> unless they have authenticated the user.
The X.400 concepts of ADMD= and PRMD= really caught on, didn't they? ;)
Peering in a world of 64K ASNs, mostly basically static, is a lot different
than peering in a world of 40 million plus .COMs, many in motion. Most of
the time, we're lucky if the MX record points to the right place....
--==_Exmh_1105569693_29183P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFB5aedcC3lWbTT17ARAuN1AKCuPTtxiXIpvh2Z9vysJ6z/icEg6wCg1l6i
qqM5kedZA0fl4UJObOaNwdU=
=X4qV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1105569693_29183P--
