[77071] in North American Network Operators' Group
True Multihoming solutions (Was: At the risk of being declared off
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Wed Jan 12 13:44:22 2005
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1105525604@imac-en0.delong.sj.ca.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:40:23 +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--=-YXZ8s7+IGiaBEh8srN6J
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 10:26 -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I realize that this is more of an IETF issue than a NANOG one, but, I'd
> like to find a couple of people with some protocol background and a stron=
g
> operational background that would be interested in trying to see if we
> can come up with a way to develop a version of IP which did not require
> a flag day, but, would facilitate a transition towards an IP where the
> End System Identifier (Host Address) could be globally unique to a given
> system (think PI space) and essentially a layer 4 construct, but, the
> Routing Tag (Network Address) could, instead, be dynamically determined
> and separate information.
Check HIP: http://hip.piuha.net/
As that is exactly what you describe.
Greets,
Jeroen
--=-YXZ8s7+IGiaBEh8srN6J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iD8DBQBB5W8XKaooUjM+fCMRAvjMAJ9Tq6LO9bhrMX5hIBiOvvD/esTGggCgkirN
/22ogwpp8QEeq3qpBA4QRVA=
=47Vh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-YXZ8s7+IGiaBEh8srN6J--
