|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:25:42 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Nash <billn@billn.net> To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk> Cc: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>, Susan Harris <srh@merit.edu>, nanog@merit.edu, Betty Burke <bburke@merit.edu>, Matt Hess <mhess@solarius.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501041756000.31712-100000@server2.tcw.telecomplete.net> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > Hi Bill, to be fair, there are specific forum for discussion of spam > tackling measures and people have been pointed in that direction on > numerous occasions, however in its generic sense it might still be on > topic for nanog. > > I note the original post that sparked this (assuming i'm following these > discussions correctly) was actually about abuse desks not spam specifically... > > So if the question is about anti-spam i think its OT, if its about abuse > or a new spam technique then its probably of interest. I would agree with this. I touched on that with mention of trojaned sources, but perhaps I should have been more clear. Thanks for the correction. - billn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |