[76324] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 16-bit ASN kludge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Dec 6 12:54:34 2004
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: John Dupuy <jdupuy-list@socket.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:23:55 PST."
<2147483647.1102087435@[172.17.1.152]>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:54:01 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1421506760P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:23:55 PST, Owen DeLong said:
> I don't see non-transit ASN leakage as any greater issue than current
> private ASN leakage.
If somebody leaks a private ASN, we can tell that it's a private ASN by
inspection.
If somebody is using '1312' inside their parallel ASN space and accidentally
leaks it, it's a bit harder to diagnose.
And if somebody is leaking 1312, I'll be quite put out... ;)
--==_Exmh_-1421506760P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFBtJy4cC3lWbTT17ARAt60AJoDrPXqQ0Ge19uFkacgqPLPwGn/BwCfdf5q
TmfOdZtWh5f6jXGhUhtFe5w=
=AaIu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1421506760P--
