[76320] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Banned on NANOG
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hannigan, Martin)
Mon Dec 6 09:05:22 2004
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
To: "'billn@billn.net'" <billn@billn.net>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:04:44 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
You expect? Bill, nothing personal, but your S:N is 0:6 at this point. Not
one single op post ever. No meeting attendance. Not one answered technical
question. How about earning a few stripes before making demands of NANOG?
Srh may be in need of a config change, but she's one of us. Show some
respect.
/plonk
-M
---
Martin Hannigan
hannigan@verisign.com
Verisign, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu <owner-nanog@merit.edu>
To: J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cybernothing.org>
CC: my network has a second name, it's n-a-n-o-g <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Sun Dec 05 00:09:58 2004
Subject: Re: Banned on NANOG
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, J.D. Falk wrote:
> On 12/04/04, Patrick W Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
>
>> I also think that makes it nearly impossible to run a good, informative
>> list. Certainly FAR more difficult than just leaving the list
>> completely unmoderated. I do not believe anyone here would argue those
>> points either (besides, obviously, the moderator herself).
>
> ...who has been silent during this whole debate, which only
> serves to feed the flames (and the flamers) as we all make wild
> guesses regarding motive and intent.
My last email contained an explicit request for a responst. I expect to
see one.
- billn
