[76074] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Tue Nov 30 19:05:20 2004
In-Reply-To: <22324595007008@schlep.emanon.com>
Cc: "'NANOG list'" <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 01:01:03 +0100
To: <swm@emanon.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 30-nov-04, at 23:32, Scott Morris wrote:
> At large NAP points (the higher order ISP's) this may make some sense
> because of the ubiquity of larger scale lines.
Why would geographical aggregation need bigger lines?
