[76008] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Mon Nov 29 17:23:08 2004

From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Message from Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com> 
	of "Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:49:33 +0100."
	<41AB8B5D.80001@nrg4u.com> 
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:22:15 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> Instead of hacking the nice and working TCP we have now you should
> move on to greener grass and use $xyzzy instead.  It does what you
> want, at least in the specification.  I don't know how many
> implementors have managed to code it properly.

i remember hearing folks tell vj and mk that when they wanted to speed
up tcp.  only the value of $xyzzy changes with time; the flat-earth
mentality of the enclosing community seems to be a constant.

> You see?

no, i think we're shouting past each other at this point, so let's stop.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post