[75996] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Mon Nov 29 14:26:18 2004
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1101725410@imac-en0.delong.sj.ca.us>
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:24:14 -0500
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 29 Nov 2004, at 13:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Right... Well... The point of the loopback thingy was that you don't
> renumber the loopback.
This is not any kind of answer to the problem of TCP session
survivability across renumbering events; it's an answer to the
non-problem of TCP session survivability when there are no renumbering
events.
> [how to suck eggs]
Joe
