[75961] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Mon Nov 29 10:00:07 2004
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Message from Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>
of "Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:17:13 +0100."
<41AB2F69.6000409@nrg4u.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:59:34 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> And please don't add any more layering violations. It makes implementors
> life painful and kills any architectual cleaniess in operating systems.
i have long wished for and sometimes needed a way to renumber a host w/o
killing or restarting its active tcp flows. this isn't a layering
violation. tcp should be able to know about endpoint-renumber events.
