[75935] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Sun Nov 28 18:23:25 2004
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Message from "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
of "Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:39:25 GMT."
<Pine.GSO.4.58.0411282226270.17114@rampart.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:22:56 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > ..., it seems to me that MULTI6's only option is to make NAT work,
> > even if you call it "site local addressing" or even "ULA's". ...
>
> there are, and will be in the future, folks that WANT NAT, regardless of
> the perceived 'badness' of it...
i know. i've met some. i've been one. please join me in trying to get
some of them onto the IAB so that, like prometheus, they can carry the
secret of fire to those in need.
