[75923] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cliff Albert)
Sun Nov 28 14:14:39 2004
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:14:12 +0100
From: Cliff Albert <cliff@oisec.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1101639391@imac-en0.delong.sj.ca.us>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:56:31AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >As I also stated in my last post (which you snipped out, and is pretty
> >relevant) is that the handing out of ASN's should be harder. Currently
> >ASN's are given to every silly dude that says 'i want multihoming'.
> >
> This simply isn't true. It was true several years ago, but, is not true
> now. (At least for ARIN. I don't know what the policies are elsewhere).
I am looking from a RIPE point of view. Lately I see ISPs popping out of
the ground requesting ASNs and having actually only 1 upstream (there
are 2 upstreams in the routing database, but in the real world there is
only 1 upstream).
--=20
Cliff Albert <cliff@oisec.net>
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBqiOEBqHMQ5qbHFoRAi/eAJ0eXb30bD/4R0/LcaI2C+327ZPgJwCfQUN3
F5VZzDRr+spwgXM9sp6PU7w=
=edCQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--
