[75910] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Roesen)
Sun Nov 28 08:26:43 2004
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:26:17 +0100
From: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20041128131317.GG10057@nudo.bsws.de>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> there are a lot of organizations now having PI without having an ASN
> and beeing multihomed. a transition to v6 with this policy would make
> things much worse for them, so why should they?
Agreed, but currently we are at "no PI for anybody but ISPs". How about
first solving the PI-denial problem for those who technically need it?
"Convenience PI holders" are a different problem space as you don't
have to account for routing in solving it.
> on the other hand, 1 ASN -> 1 v6 prefix does not necessarily mean 1 v6
> prefix -> 1 ASN. might work out.
Exactly.
Regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
