[75863] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Nov 26 04:29:49 2004
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 01:29:21 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200411260816.IAA25276@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========964233830BD339892791==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
> Anyone starting out will be an end site, if that meant you could only
> ever be an end site then there'd be nothing but end sites. Skip to the
> not an end site section and meet those requirements instead.
>
Agreed... However, the letter of the law in the policy still should be
revisited to express that intent.
>> I think we definitely need
>> to review v6 allocation policy and improve its consistency and ability
>> to meet the needs of the community if v6 is to make real progress =
towards
>> broad adoption.
>
> I think working on the technical deficiences others have outlined
> would help more.
>
I don't think these are mutually exclusive. I think IETF should work on =
the
technical deficiencies of the protocol. I think the RIRs and ICANN should=20
work
on the policy issues. I see no reason those efforts can't proceed in
parallel.
Owen
--=20
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
--==========964233830BD339892791==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBpvdxn5zKWQ/iqj0RAmrkAKCGQ26/RCI0gNqgXeo81T4ICtIs0QCfe5fJ
i9ABE0u0wyVN04nr+hvBl9g=
=6TPV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========964233830BD339892791==========--
