[75839] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Thu Nov 25 16:05:11 2004
In-Reply-To: <41A63E71.4000405@complicity.co.uk>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:04:36 +0100
To: "Ryan O'Connell" <ryan-nanog@complicity.co.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 25-nov-04, at 21:20, Ryan O'Connell wrote:
>> Why do people keep talking about 200 sites? This is a fallacy.
> If you're not assigning IP addresses to other users, (I.e. you're an
> Enterprise rather than an ISP) you need 200 sites. (As you're
> "allowed" one /48 per site, and need 200 /48s to get an assignment.)
Untrue. It's "other organizations".
> RIPE policy is pretty much identical to ARIN.
They're all the same. ARIN just slightly changed the wording from the
common document recently.
