[7582] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RFC1918 conformance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Bates)
Mon Feb 17 22:03:52 1997
To: Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:27:36 EST.
<199702111927.OAA22283@home.partan.com>
From: Tony Bates <tbates@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 18:26:43 -0800
Right now it checks for:
>= 64/8 && <= 127/8
> 211/8
RFC1918 set of prefixes
--Tony
Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com> writes:
* > This would be good as I report each week in my report possible bogus
* > routes but no one seems to care to filter (or fix this). Today it says:
*
* Which routes to you consider to be bogons?
* --asp@partan.com (Andrew Partan)
