[75782] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: ULA and RIR cost-recovery
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Nov 23 15:22:13 2004
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:21:36 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>,
"'John Curran'" <jcurran@mail.com>,
"'Stephen Sprunk'" <stephen@sprunk.org>
Cc: "'North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20041123190955.2613958E7C@segue.merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========02CE80066F040DE4F973==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
> I have never been a fan of the registered ULAs, and have argued against
> the IETF's attempts to state specific monetary values or lifetime
> practice as a directive to the RIRs; but I am equally bothered by the
> thought that the operator community would feel a need to fight against
> something that really doesn't impact them.
Perhaps it is because in the perception of the operator community, we do
not believe it will not impact us. The reality is that once registered =
ULAs
become available, the next and obvious step will be enterprises that =
receive
them demanding that their providers route them. Economic pressure will
override IETF ideal, and, operator impact is the obvious result.
Owen
--=20
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
--==========02CE80066F040DE4F973==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBo5vUn5zKWQ/iqj0RAlDuAJ9YvNbfHiU+9HL6pawH16WCvSa+OgCeI4Iq
nGhcy1PoDVEua4g2lH23Ouc=
=XSUk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========02CE80066F040DE4F973==========--
