[75763] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elmar K. Bins)
Tue Nov 23 05:09:35 2004
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:09:07 +0100
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi@4ever.de>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <94A90B3C-3CE0-11D9-992B-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
iljitsch@muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) wrote:
> >For instance, 212.x.y.z is "known" to be on one continent, and so on -
> >but how do you leverage that into a 212/8 routing entry?
>
> Well, suppose we know 212/8 is used in Europe. A network that is
> present in say, North America and Europe then has the routers in Europe
> that talk to the routers in America filter out all 212/8 more specifics
> and only announce the aggregate instead. In the simple version this
> only works if there is full interconnection for all 212/8 destination
> in Europe.
And if everyone gives transit to anyone. Ideal world.
Elmi.
--
"Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren."
(PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2@ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>)
--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
