[75751] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nils Ketelsen)
Mon Nov 22 16:42:29 2004

Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:41:52 -0500
From: Nils Ketelsen <nils.ketelsen@kuehne-nagel.com>
To: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <DEFFB5A2-3BEC-11D9-992B-000A95CD987A@muada.com>; from iljitsch@muada.com on Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:40:52PM +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:40:52PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:


> > Who said the only purpose of IP was to connect to the Internet?
> 
> Not me. But if you don't connect to the internet you don't contribute 
> to the global routing table so there is no issue.  :-)
> 
> The point is, that these days applications such as mail and web are 
> sufficiently heavy that you can't even run them cost effectively over 
> dial up (wasting your employee's time costs more than the fatter line) 
> let alone less.

The Fork Lift driver in some random warehouse does not need email. All
he needs is his Barcode scanner to send an 8Digit-Number over the
line every 1 or two minutes and get an equal
length reply telling him where to Haul the box whose barcode he just
scanned.


Nils

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post