[75707] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Sun Nov 21 12:06:53 2004
In-Reply-To: <1100864784.8980.34.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>,
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:59:57 +0100
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-11-19, at 12.46, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:15 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>> On 18-nov-04, at 18:02, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>>
>>> Larger enterprises probably consist of 200 'sites' already, eg
>>> seperate
>>> offices, locations etc. Thus they can, after becoming a LIR and
>>> getting
>>> an ASN, which most of the time they already have, easily get a /32.
>>
>> Jeroen, this is nonsense and you know it.
>
> It is not nonsense as long as 'multi6' doesn't have a solution to the
> problem, but as politics go above getting solutions...
I am not sure I follow you here? Multi6 in D.C decided to spin of the
protocol work in a new WG under the Internet Area. I think that for the
last few years, multi6 has moved forward as fast as anyone could ask.
- - kurtis - / Co-chair multi6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQZ9b8qarNKXTPFCVEQLV2wCg+XtQqEH/oo0QjoT4a3LHag8YHlwAoP2I
L/o/iD6ydT1aXpIz5xYR3MLO
=s/g5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
